No edit summary Tag: rte-source |
No edit summary Tag: sourceedit |
||
Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
*This would only be for that rare time for when 2 people are on chat and they are both AFK. It would be a rare thing, but would kill chat when it was already dead. This wouldn't be done without notice of multiple pings and a few minutes wait. --[[User:ToaMatau2004|<font color="teal">Matau</font>]] [[File:Lunk animination.gif|50px]] <font color="purple"><small>"I buy now!"</small></font> 00:17, December 15, 2015 (UTC) |
*This would only be for that rare time for when 2 people are on chat and they are both AFK. It would be a rare thing, but would kill chat when it was already dead. This wouldn't be done without notice of multiple pings and a few minutes wait. --[[User:ToaMatau2004|<font color="teal">Matau</font>]] [[File:Lunk animination.gif|50px]] <font color="purple"><small>"I buy now!"</small></font> 00:17, December 15, 2015 (UTC) |
||
** I still say no. This still doesn't seem fair. --[[User:ZootyCutie|ZootyCutie]] ([[User talk:ZootyCutie|talk]]) 00:20, December 15, 2015 (UTC) |
** I still say no. This still doesn't seem fair. --[[User:ZootyCutie|ZootyCutie]] ([[User talk:ZootyCutie|talk]]) 00:20, December 15, 2015 (UTC) |
||
+ | **Then perhaps should we tell people not to stay on chat when they have to go somewhere for a long time? Having 2 AFK users on chat just to be there doesn't help.--[[User:ToaMatau2004|<font color="teal">Matau</font>]] [[File:Lunk animination.gif|50px]] <font color="purple"><small>"I buy now!"</small></font> 00:23, December 15, 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:23, 15 December 2015
These are the current votes for important decisions on the Mixels Wiki. Please do take part! Remember to read the voting policy first. Read over the archive to make sure a similar vote has not been added before you create one.
Featured Article
- Main article: Mixels Wiki:Featured Article
Featured Image
- Main article: Mixels Wiki:Featured Image
Mixel of the Month
- Main article: Mixels Wiki:Mixel of the Month
Featured OC
- Main article: Mixels Wiki:Featured OC
Main Votes
The Wiki's Votes Page is made to hold all kinds of votes.
When a vote is held, you will be allowed to sign your username, using four tildes ~~~~
Each vote will be published in this way:
===<Vote name> (0)=== :Suggested by <your name> and confirmed by <administrator name> ====For (0)==== ====Against (0)==== ====Comments====
Nominee Notice: After being nominated, you can enter reasons on why you should be nominated next to the "nomination sentence". A vote closes when 14 days is up. The vote difference is calculated by the number of votes "for" subtracted by the number "against". The user option with the most vote differences wins.
Voter Notice: You must vote in either "For" or "Against". If you vote in for, you have to sign underneath the "For" heading. To do this you have to type this in:
#~~~~
After you have signed it, you must change the number in the brackets up by 1. (e.g if it was at 3, it means 3 people have already signed it. Change it to 4 when you sign it.) This is also the same with the number by their name. If you vote for, you must also increase the number beside his or her name by 1.
Please remember to use "#" instead of the usual "*", because it numbers the votes making it easier to count them.
You can also remove your vote. If in any case you change your mind, do not remove your vote completely, just strike it out and move it to the back of the list.
Killing Chat rule (1)
If people are in chat but nobody is talking/ they are afk and nobody is there, an admin would ask if they can kill the chat by pinging all afk users. After 5 minutes if nobody has joined the chat. The admin can kill the chat. Alternately (doesn't need to be part of rule), if a user is always AFK when nobody frequently, they can be briefly chat banned.
For(1)
- --Matau "I buy now!" 23:58, December 14, 2015 (UTC)
For + Alternate rule(1)
- Did you mean to oppose?--Matau "I buy now!" 00:03, December 15, 2015 (UTC)
Against(1)
- No. A lot of people get upset when they're kicked when they're AFK. Also, how do we know WHY they were AFK? What if someone that had an emergency left real quick? This is not a good idea. --ZootyCutie (talk) 00:11, December 15, 2015 (UTC)
- This would only be for that rare time for when 2 people are on chat and they are both AFK. It would be a rare thing, but would kill chat when it was already dead. This wouldn't be done without notice of multiple pings and a few minutes wait. --Matau "I buy now!" 00:17, December 15, 2015 (UTC)
- I still say no. This still doesn't seem fair. --ZootyCutie (talk) 00:20, December 15, 2015 (UTC)
- Then perhaps should we tell people not to stay on chat when they have to go somewhere for a long time? Having 2 AFK users on chat just to be there doesn't help.--Matau "I buy now!" 00:23, December 15, 2015 (UTC)