FANDOM


(Created page with "<div class="quote">Volectro wrote:<br /><div class="quote">D MixHel S wrote:<br /><div class="quote">Green Ninja wrote:<br />What? We allowed leaks for Series 4. And ''I'' say...")
 
 
Line 2: Line 2:
   
 
We (including me, TBH; but mostly all of us) were being ignorant about that policy. I only knew about that months ago, but I am only being silent 'til now.
 
We (including me, TBH; but mostly all of us) were being ignorant about that policy. I only knew about that months ago, but I am only being silent 'til now.
</div>I don't see anything in those links that says it's illegal.
+
</div>I don't see anything in those links that says it's illegal.</div>
</div>
+
There's no word illegal there, I agree, but the thought was there.
There's no word illegal there, I agree, but the thought is there.
 

Latest revision as of 14:56, September 18, 2015

Volectro wrote:
D MixHel S wrote:
Green Ninja wrote:
What? We allowed leaks for Series 4. And I say these will be allowed. We don't have an official connection with LEGO, anyway.
According to this and this, we should really need to remove the confidentially marked images from the wiki. Even though we're not part of the LEGO group or have a connection to them, we should have to respect their policies, like TheBrickFan says so.

We (including me, TBH; but mostly all of us) were being ignorant about that policy. I only knew about that months ago, but I am only being silent 'til now.

I don't see anything in those links that says it's illegal.

There's no word illegal there, I agree, but the thought was there.

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.