Board Thread:Fun and Games/@comment-28966650-20170117155924/@comment-26228416-20170223201448

Mixingitall wrote: MlNlCUPCAKE wrote: Mixingitall wrote: MlNlCUPCAKE wrote: Mixingitall wrote: I SAY WE NON-STAFF TAKE OVER THE WIKI!!!

Now that I have your attention, Let me explain. I think that the last non-staff users would best take the places of staff that became inactive/left the wiki. I also believe that that the standards should be a user who has stayed on the wiki for a long period of time.

Coach Z, You jerk! 19:06, February 23, 2017 (UTC) steps in, being staff isn't easy at all ~ steps out,

-Hijohshiki (talk) 19:27, February 23, 2017 (UTC) Exactly my point. I'm talking about a user that actually has the responsibility needed to become staff. That's why I mention a long-time user. They've witnessed the staff work when the wiki flourished. They also best would be a user that overall abides by the rules. So, what I'm saying is that we would have users that are overall responsible and can handle the pressure to be staff to take the places of inactive staff. ohhh, gotcha, good intentions, but you'll need to talk to higher 'crats on that ~

-Hijohshiki (talk) 19:58, February 23, 2017 (UTC) Ok. LET'S START AN ANARCHY!!!

Jk.

Coach Z, You jerk! 20:09, February 23, 2017 (UTC) POWER TO THE PEOPLE!

No government! But we should still have government, because then the wiki will truly be in anarchy.

LFF to the end, bad vibes I amend (talk) 20:14, February 23, 2017 (UTC)

(why are we always using quotes)